We had our own battle with covid in March and April of 2020
with the covid fog lingering, sadly, even until now..
As the fog lifts, with help from Spock,
we try to understand the apparently
stacked deck against the Brooklyn Lyceum.
In the end it became clear
that the abundantly wrong decision
against the Brooklyn Lyceum
actually
made another issue shockingly clear
in that it was irrelevant
before the abject appellate decision,
but front and center
post abject appellate decision.
so we can run with
that decision as
"the law of the case"
whilst we fight the appellate court decision.
When, before,
there was a nuanced law (abandonement)
that would have reset the clock back to no case at all ...
we now have
a straightforward set of
procedural due process violations
a 5th grader could see
these issues,
at a minimum ...
reset the case back to
March, 2011,
almost 4 years
prior to the sale of the Brooklyn Lyceum.
For starters:
failure to serve Lyceum atty
the notice of Motion
for a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale
That notice was
in and of itself
facially and fatally flawed
for a couple of reasons:
First, it notices
People to appear a decade in the past,
to a time before when the complaint even existed.
Second, it fails
the requirement
that the notice state the statute
under which all are being noticed
provides for the relief requested
(judgment of foreclosure and sale)
These are simple issues
are akin to ...
shooting fish in a barrel -or-
like drawing to an inside royal flush!